Skip to content

WHITEHEADBOOKS.com

> > > > connecting ideas

  • Home
  • Original Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Books
  • Useful Links
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

Month: March 2019

Posted on March 31, 2019May 27, 2019

Bad habits

Image of young woman drinking in a bar.
Not a problem

One of the most frustrating things about alcoholism is denial, a distortion of awareness. This mysterious change in perception is a kind of blindness that masks the alcoholic swath of destruction. Without it, the addictive behavior would grind to a halt.

Distorted awareness isn’t limited to addictions, though. As it happens, there are an enormous number of repetitive, highly destructive patterns that spiral out of control in pretty much the same way.

Malignant behaviors

Most of these problem behaviors do not involve chemical substances. To illustrate, addictions to gambling or strange sexual acts aren’t related to substance use. Nor is the eating disorder anorexia nervosa. Yet each of these patterns is marked by a dramatic change in perception that keeps it going.

What in the world could account for the stubborn persistence of destructive habits like these? And what could explain the changes in awareness that go along with these patterns? Answers have eluded theorists for decades. I believe that the explanations will come – oddly enough – from applying the principles of parasitology and immunology to human behavior.

Rogue habits

A key insight is that habits can “go rogue.” That is, they can get out of our control, and start acting in a runaway manner that becomes parasitic. This happens the same way the cells of our bodies can turn cancerous to form tumors that become parasitic.

Normally, cells act for the benefit of the larger body. And normally habits operate for the larger benefit of the individual. But both rogue cells and rogue habits can abandon their assigned roles. They can begin acting for the singular goal of reproducing themselves, without regard to the harm they cause.

The exact way rogue habits come into being, and the reason for the accompanying distortion of awareness, are the subjects of my current book, Rogue Habits. If you want to learn more about out-of-control behavior, a good place to start is the material on this website.

Share this:

  • Share
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
Posted on March 27, 2019May 18, 2019

Is Language Alive?

I read a couple of interesting articles this week. One of them is Lane Greene’s “Who decides what words mean?” The subtitle of this article is “Bound by rules, yet constantly changing, language might be the ultimate self-regulating system, with nobody in charge.” The other article is “The History of Appalachian English.” That one’s about why people in the Blue Ridge mountains – and parts of Texas – talk the way they do.

Languages include words, and the meanings of those words, the sentence structures which contain them, and the unconsciously applied rules in the minds and hearts of native speakers. Languages evolve, just as surely as animals do. Language never stands still. Nobody is in control, and nobody can tell it what to do. The only rule, it seems, is the same rule that governs living things. As a whole, it has to work – just like a species, it has to survive.

Read More

When one word changes its meaning or its pronunciation, others modify themselves to accommodate it. Just like the separate genes in an animal’s genome. Language is incredibly robust. It wants to stay alive.

As I read Greene’s interesting piece, I found myself asking: Are languages alive in some real sense? Each part of a language has to “work and play well” with all the other parts. In an animal, when one gene changes, that gene becomes part of the environment of all the other genes in the genome. Those other genes start evolving to accommodate the change. The whole hangs together and continues to work. Greene says,

Sounds, words and grammar do not exist in isolation: each of these three levels of language constitutes a system in itself. And, extraordinarily, these systems change as systems. If one change threatens disruption, another change compensates, so that the new system, though different from the old, is still an efficient, expressive and useful whole. 1

Language is a self-governing system. Its features are there for the same kind of reasons that the features of species are there: Variation and selection. Language has lots of dialects. That’s variation. What people end up using goes on. What doesn’t work dies out.

I took a History of the English Language course in college. The professor who taught the course was keen to impress upon us that languages don’t exist apart from the people who speak them, that all languages are constantly evolving, and that all of them exist in the form of multiple dialects. People in different areas speak in different ways. He stressed that looking down on others who don’t speak it like you do is just another form of bigotry.

He used this illustration. Some people look on the people in Appalachian regions of the US as hillbillies who “don’t talk right.” Appalachians speak a different dialect of English. They pronounce words differently. Sometimes they use different words. Sometimes they use different language structure, reversing verbs and objects, etc. Appalachian Magazine contains an article by a native speaker. He says,

Many of us pronounce words such as “wire,” “fire,” “tire,” and “retired” as “war,” “far,” “tar,” and “retard” respectively. Appalachian-English also places an “-er” sound at an end of a word with a long “o”.  For example, “hollow”— a small, sheltered valley— is pronounced like “holler”.  Other examples are “potato” (pronounced “tader”), “tomato” (pronounced “mader”), and “tobacco” (pronounced “backer”). 2

The professor told us not to be sure that we’re the ones “talking right.” It seems the way Appalachians speak is closer to the historical roots of English, and in that sense could be considered more correct.

Why do Appalachians pronounce words the way they do? It seems people in this region were relatively isolated, and so preserved the purity of Elizabethan English, while the rest of the country drifted away. As an expert in Middle English himself, the prof believed it likely that some Appalachians could actually converse with an Elizabethan-English speaker. The Appalachian Magazine article goes on to say,

The existence of Appalachian-English is the result of the isolation the mountains beyond the Blue Ridge ensured — making our dialect one of the most ancient and protected dialects in the nation. While our high-browed relatives who moved to the big city and lost their accent may frown upon our words and pronunciations, it is believed that the Appalachian dialect is a remnant of Elizabethan English. An evidence of this is the use of words such as “afeared”, a Shakespearean word that is largely forgotten by most English speakers outside of the Appalachian region. Other ancient phrases include the use of “might could” for “might be able to”, the use of “‘un” with pronouns and adjectives (e.g., young’un), the use of “done” as a helping verb (e.g., “we done finished it”), and the use of words such as airish, brickle, swan, and bottom land all of which were common in Southern and Central England in 17th and 18th centuries. 2

As the learned professor stressed, we just can’t justify looking down on dialects spoken by people in other regions. No dialect is any more “correct” than the others. Language is a living thing. All its variants are part of the language, though some are closer to the historical roots.


References

  1. Greene L. Who decides what words mean? Available online at https://aeon.co/essays/why-language-might-be-the-optimal-self-regulating-system
  2. Anonymous. The History of Appalachian English: Why We Talk Differently. Appalachian Magazine, November 23, 2017. Available online at http://appalachianmagazine.com/2017/11/23/the-history-of-appalachian-english-why-we-talk-differently

Share this:

  • Share
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit

Search

Recent Posts

  • Healing Psychology – Introduction January 10, 2022
  • A New Psychology July 13, 2020
  • When Habits Slip their Leash July 22, 2019
  • Servant Leaders May 22, 2019
  • Real Zombies May 13, 2019

Recent Comments

  • Bill Whitehead on Chatbots 101: From Digital DNA to Dialogue
  • towhitehead on Healing Psychology – Introduction
  • RICH NELSON on Healing Psychology – Introduction
  • towhitehead on Understanding Jung’s Archetypes
  • Bill Whitehead on Understanding Jung’s Archetypes

Archives

  • January 2022
  • July 2020
  • July 2019
  • May 2019
  • March 2019

Translate

Subscribe to my blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 4 other subscribers
Privacy Policy Proudly powered by WordPress